Catalog data and freshness

Coverage

Specs are filled from the maker's own page or a primary-equivalent hands-on, never guessed. Where a figure is not published we leave it blank rather than invent it, so these bars are honest floors, not targets. The two largest structural gaps, case weight and grade confidence, are exactly where makers publish least (haute horlogerie rarely states case weight; many brands confirm titanium but never a grade token).

How it stays current

The site rebuilds on every change, and a set of scheduled jobs re-checks the catalog on rotation so nothing silently goes stale:

• A daily scan of the watch press surfaces newly announced titanium references as leads.
• A daily pass works the reader-suggestion and discovery queues through the titanium inclusion gate.
• A twice-monthly sweep re-verifies a rotating batch of below-high-confidence entries and promotes the ones whose maker has since published the missing detail.
• A twice-monthly sweep re-checks high-confidence entries for price drift, sold-out versus discontinued, and dead maker pages.
• A twice-monthly sweep fills missing case weights from maker pages and primary-source hands-on reviews.

Every change still goes through review before it publishes; nothing is auto-merged. Read the full breakdown of the market in The State of Titanium Watches 2026.

Confidence

1002 entries are high confidence (51%), confirmed against the maker or a primary source; 958 are medium. The medium pool is large by design: many makers (including several maisons and most microbrands) confirm titanium but never publish an exact grade token, so those entries stay honestly medium rather than being padded to look more certain than the sourcing supports.

Recently checked

Browse the full catalog, the collections, or suggest a watch we are missing.